Legal Opinion

Motoda v. Donohoe

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 15, 1969No. 46-40320-1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Marie Donohoe rented an apartment from Kiyo Motoda, an apartment house owner, on a month-to-month tenancy. She was served with a 20-day notice to quit the premises. Upon her refusal to leave, the owner brought an action for unlawful detainer under RCW 59.12.030.

The trial court granted a motion to strike appellant’s answer and also granted judgment on the pleadings. Donohoe appeals and assigns as error these actions by the trial court.

The sole question we decide on appeal is whether certain “equitable defenses” raised presented an issue of fact which made a judgment on the pleadings…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Watkins v. BalchWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Young v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Northcraft v. BlumauerWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. MacRae v. WayWashington Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Purnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF PASCO AND FRANKLIN CTY. v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Peoples National Bank v. OstranderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Housing Authority v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. First Union Management, Inc. v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API