Legal Opinion

Young v. Riley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1961No. 35948PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

George Young and Marta Young, husband and wife, the plaintiffs in an action for unlawful detainer, appeal from a judgment granting Maude Riley, alias Maude Desmond, 1 a set-off against rent due plaintiffs, and declaring rights under a purported written lease.

The plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that a portion of the home in question was orally rented to defendant Maude Riley for one hundred fifty dollars a month, and that there was a default in payment of rent after statutory notice to pay rent or to vacate. The prayer was for a judgment for double the amount of the rent due and for restoration…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ralph v. LomerWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Phillips v. Port Townsend Lodge, No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Woodward v. BlanchettWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hinton v. HotchkissArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Chung v. Louie Fong Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Munden v. HazelriggWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF EVERETT v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Peoples National Bank v. OstranderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Granat v. KeaslerWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. First Union Management, Inc. v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API