State Of Washington v. Joshua J. Clark
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKorsmo, J.
¶1 Joshua Clark claims a right to have his unchallenged legal financial obligations (LFOs) considered initially on appeal pursuant to RAP 2.5(a)(2). We reject that argument and, in the unpublished portion of this case, also reject his CrR 3.3 challenge to his convictions for attempting to elude and possession of a controlled substance.
FACTS
¶2 This action is a companion to State v. Clark, 191 Wn. App. 369, 362 P.3d 309 (2015) (published in part) (Clark I). As with this case, the issues presented on appeal in Clark I involved an LFO challenge and a time for trial claim. The Clark I trial and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Batten v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Gross v. City of LynnwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Jesse JohnsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- In the Matter of the Sanction Order Against Robert CritchlowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Tina Marie HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State of Washington v. D.E.D.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State of Washington v. Shalin E. AlltusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.