Lane v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Enginemen & Firemen
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.
It is admitted that plaintiff’s claim was properly filed, that the same was denied by the general secretary and treasurer of defendant society, and that defendant duly exhausted all remedies of appeal within the order. The testimony shows that he was a strong able-bodied man when he became a member of the defendant Brotherhood; that he has not been able to and has not performed any work of any nature for remuneration or profit since May 7,1932, and has done no work whatsoever since that time, and that for the past four years he has been able to get around only by the use of crutches, either…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen Friends v. ForsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Railway Passenger & Freight Conductors' Mutual Aid & Benefit Ass'n v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Bauer v. International Waste Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Perkins v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- McHorse v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomlinson-Arkwright Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.