Legal Opinion
Maville v. Peerless Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 25, 1996No. 95-212PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The plaintiffs, Douglas Maville and Anthony Ivanov, appeal a decision of the Superior Court {Morrill, J.) declaring automobile liability coverage by the defendant, Peerless Insurance Company (Peerless), to be $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident. We affirm.
The following facts were adduced at trial. Bradley Sausville owns a truck which he insures through Peerless. On September 10, 1993, Sausville telephoned his insurance agent, Michael Crate of the Goss-Logan Insurance Agency, and requested a reduction in his liability insurance from $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident, to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Herbert E. Martz v. Union Labor Life Insurance Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Gelinas v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- C & M Realty Trust v. WiedenkellerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Great American Dining, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Philbrick v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Preferred National Insurance v. Docusearch, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Brouillard v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Appeal of JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.