Legal Opinion

Kulenkamp v. Timesavers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1988No. C6-87-1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Timesavers, Inc. and its workers’ compensation insurer, Midland Insurance Company/Minnesota Guaranty Association (hereinafter employer/insurer) seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals’ decision reversing the findings and order of a compensation judge who considered the issue of primary liability in a discontinuance proceéding. We reverse and remand for further proceedings before the compensation judge.

In November 1973, Leonard R. Kulen-kamp (hereinafter employee) started working as a janitor for employer, a company that manufactures wide belt sanding machinery.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marose v. Maislin TransportSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Brajan v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Lauer v. Tri-Mont Cooperative CreamerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roemhildt v. Gresser Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Dille v. Knox Lumber/Division of Southwest ForestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Fielding v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Manderfeld v. JC PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Dille v. Knox Lumber/Division of Southwest ForestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API