Legal Opinion
Manderfeld v. JC Penney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 6, 1995No. C6-94-1003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Justice.
We reverse a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) relating to the forfeiture of benefits.
Margaret Manderfeld sustained a compen-sable injury on May 8, 1991, while employed by a J.C. Penney store as an assistant in the visual merchandise department. As a.result of her injury, Manderfeld was unable to re turn to her pre-injury job. In October 1992, after Manderfeld failed to accept a formal offer of alternate employment, J.C. Penney and its workers’ compensation insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, initiated proceedings to discontinue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- O'Mara v. State of Minn./u. of M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Kulenkamp v. Timesavers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Fischer v. Saga Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Schnider v. SchniderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roemhildt v. Gresser Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Bruns v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Falls v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Alcozer v. North Country Food BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Alcozer v. North Country Food BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001