Legal Opinion

Pullman Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1946No. S. F. 17295PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

On February 13, 1942, respondent Mira, a seamstress employed by petitioner Pullman Company, filed her application for workmen’s compensation. After a hearing respondent Industrial Accident Commission found that the employe sustained industrial injury on April 20, 1940, that temporary disability resulted on January 22, 1942, and awarded compensation therefor. From time to time, after further hearings, the award was amended in particulars hereinafter related. On April 10, 1945, the commission made an order which amends previous orders and awards compensation for permanent partial disability.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Argonaut Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Great Western Power Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. LeBoeuf v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kay Construction Co. v. County Council for Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Solari v. Atlas-Universal Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Nicky Blair's Restaurant v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API