Legal Opinion

Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1936No. S. F. 15562PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is a proceeding to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission, setting aside a previous order of the commission and vacating the award therein granted to the injured employee against his employer and the employer’s insurance carrier, and granting to said injured employee an increased award for permanent disability.

Petitioners seek the annulment of this latter award upon the ground that the commission acted without and in excess of its jurisdiction in reopening the cause under the claimed authority of section 20 (d) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. We are of the opinion that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hines v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Georgia Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ingram v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Brunski v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. LeBoeuf v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Kay Construction Co. v. County Council for Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Pullman Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API