Legal Opinion

Barnett v. County of Washoe

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1970No. 6129Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

The narrow issue presented for our consideration on this appeal calls for our interpretation of the habendum clause set forth in the original deed that conveyed the property known as the Washoe County Golf Course to Washoe County.

*7321. The Facts.

In 1935, Messrs. Harlan L. Heward and Leo F. Schmitt and Country Club, Inc., owners of the property in question, deeded it to the County. The deed contained the following provision:

“This deed is made subject to the additional covenant, that the premises hereby conveyed shall be used and operated for golf and golfing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Rosecrans v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gramer v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hawe v. HaweIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Alamo School District v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API