Legal Opinion

Hawe v. Hawe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1965No. 9379PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Justice.

Respondents brought this action to determine their interest in and to certain real property. Respondents contend that they are owners in fee simple of an undivided one-half interest thereto. By counterclaim appellants seek to quiet title in themselves to the entire property.

At the time of trial of this action, the principal participants in the transactions in question, Arleigh H. Hawe and Edward Hawe, were deceased. However, chain of record title to the property is established through documentary evidence.

Title to the property was in Edward Hawe and his wife, Agnes…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Murphy Land & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Angleton v. AngletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Carrington v. CrandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1944

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Russ Ballard & Family Achievement Institute v. Lava Hot Springs Resort, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hettinga v. SybrandyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hasse v. Rainsdon (In Re Pringle)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. MATTER OF ESTATE OF COURTRIGHT v. RobertsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Estate of Hull v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API