Legal Opinion
Molloy v. Meier
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 20, 2004No. C9-02-1821, C2-02-1837PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Kimberly Molloy (Molloy) and her husband, Glenn Molloy, brought a medical malpractice action against appellants Dr. Diane Meier, Dr. Reno Backus, and Dr. Kathryn Green, claiming they were negligent in failing to diagnose a genetic disorder in Molloy’s daughter and their negligence caused Molloy to conceive another child with the same genetic disorder. The district court denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment and concluded that a physician who performs genetic tests on a child owes a.duty to the biological parents of that child; that the action did not accrue…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Schroeder v. PerkelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2018
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.