Mitan v. Feeney
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT FEENEYS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION [9]; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT FEE-NEYS’ REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF VENUE [9]; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AMERICAN EXPRESS’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(B)(6) [17]; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT AMERICAN EXPRESS’S MOTION TO STRIKE [15]
WILSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Kenneth Mitán (“Plaintiff’ or “Mitán”) filed this suit against Defendants Doug and Doreen Feeney (“the Feeneys”) and Defendant American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“American Express”) in Los Angeles…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- First Community Bank, N.A. v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Bankruptcy Estate of Felt Manufacturing Co. v. Foss (In Re Felt Manufacturing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007
- Chapman v. KrutonogDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2009
- Anticancer Inc. v. Xenogen Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- ADAM v. BARONEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.