Legal Opinion

ADAM v. BARONE

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 10, 2020No. 3:20-cv-10321Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CINDY ADAM, Case No. 20-cv-00761-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 9 v. TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1404(a) OR, IN THE 10 FRANK V. BARONE, et al., ALTERNATIVE, TO DISMISS 11 Defendants. Docket Nos. 35, 38 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 This lawsuit pertains to an alleged fraudulent scheme in which beauty products are 15 advertised as “free samples,” but consumers are later inconspicuously charged for monthly 16 subscriptions. Plaintiff Cindy Adam filed the operative First Amended…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API