Legal Opinion
Crosby v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 2010No. Nos. 09 Civ. 9693(SAS), 09 Civ. 9694(SAS), 09 Civ. 9695(SAS)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
The District Attorney’s Office of New York County (“DANY”), which is not a party to the above-captioned civil-rights actions, moves for an order quashing portions of three subpoenas duces tecum served on DANY by plaintiffs. For the reasons provided below, DANY’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
II. BACKGROUND
In 2009, amidst a public outcry from the gay community that the New York Police Department (“NYPD”) was entrapping men on prostitution charges,1 DANY conducted two separate investigations into the arrests.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Barrick v. Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian CharitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Schomburg v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. GhavamiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.