Legal Opinion
Schumacher Stone Co. v. Village of Columbus Grove
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1944No. 347PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiddleton, J.
The issues in this case are made up by the third amended petition, an answer and a reply.
The third amended petition sets forth that the plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of Ohio; that the defendant is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of Ohio; that the defendant, by order and authority of its council, purchased at various and numerous times, certain crushed stone with which to maintain and repair its streets, alleys and -other property; that no one of such orders amounted to or exceeded the sum of fifty dollars; that no part of 'such stone was sold or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Cincinnati Ry Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Hawley v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
- Village of Pleasant Ridge v. Dayton Limestone Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kimbrell v. Village of Seven MileOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Robert G. Sproul v. City of WoosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- City of Seven Hills v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Atkinson v. City of DaytonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
- Robert G. Sproul v. City of WoosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.