Legal Opinion

Hawley v. City of Toledo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1934No. 2889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By RICHARDS, J.

The evidence shows that the expenditure was not authorized by the city council and was in violation of §228 of the City Charter which prohibits the making of contracts involving the expenditure of $500.00 or more without the authorization of council. The contract was also in violation of §226 of the City Charter which prohibits the entering into a contract by the city involving the expenditure of money unless the Direct- or of Finance shall first certify to the council or to the proper officer that the money required for such contract is'in the treasury to the credit of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Toledo v. National Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schumacher Stone Co. v. Village of Columbus GroveOhio Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API