Continental Casualty Co. v. Cincinnati Ry Supply Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MIDDLETON, PJ.
The Casualty Co., bring this proceeding to reverse the judgment against it so rendered, and contends that the trial court erred in several particulars in the trial of the case. It insists now that its motion for a directed judgment should have been sustained for the reason that the supply company neither pleaded nor proved an enforceable legal contract between the village of Berea and the contractor, The Smith Company. The Casualty Co., maintains that it was not shown that the certificate as required by 5625-33 GC w,as attached to said contract.
An inspection of the record…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Schumacher Stone Co. v. Village of Columbus GroveOhio Court of Appeals · 1944