Legal Opinion
Atkinson v. City of Dayton
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 10, 1998No. C-3-97-301PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #19); NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT SANDRA HUGGINS IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; THIS ENTRY IS NOT A FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER.
RICE, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 19) on the Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. # 1), a complaint which alleges violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1988, and 1441; 5 U.S.C. § 3101; 2 U.S.C. § 601; and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The Complaint also includes unspecified…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ardito v. City of ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2003
- Urban 8 Fox Lake Corporation v. Nationwide Affordable Housing Fund 4, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019