Legal Opinion

Robert G. Sproul v. City of Wooster

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1988No. 86-3781PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Sproul is a real estate developer who obtained an option on substantial acreage located primarily in Wayne Township, Ohio. Most of the acreage adjoins the defendant City of Wooster city limits, but two acres under option were actually in Wooster. Sproul acquired these options intending to construct a shopping center and residential development on the site. Before the project could come to fruition, however, it was necessary to secure water and sewer service from the City of- Wooster for the entire development. Approval was from Wooster for expansion of its…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dan Bowers v. The City of FlintCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Sweeney v. Athens Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989
  3. Gavlak v. Town of SomersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
  4. Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. City of PontiacCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Mobile County Water, Sewer & Fire Protection Authority, Inc. v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API