Cullison v. Hotel Seaside, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
It will be noticed that the easement granted by the deeds to plaintiffs and their predecessors is couched in general terms and is somewhat ambiguous. Where an easement in land is granted in general terms, without giving definite location and description to it, so that the part of land over which the right is to be exercised cannot be definitely ascertained, the grantee does not thereby acquire a right to use the servient estate without limitation as to the place or mode in which the easement is to be enjoyed. But the location may be subsequently fixed by an express agreement of the parties,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lowes v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Patterson v. Chambers Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Holt v. FleischmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Salem Capital Flour Mills Co. v. Stayton Water-Ditch & Canal Co.United States Circuit Court · 1887
3Cited by12 opinions
- POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Beck v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Van Natta v. Nys & EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Earl v. Pavex, Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
- Hanns v. FriedlyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.