Lowes v. Carter
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from tbe Circuit Court ISTo. 2 of Baltimore City. (Ambler, L) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
In June, 3900, the appellant purchased from Frank H. Plielps a lot of ground in the suburbs of Baltimore forming part of a subdivision known as “Ridgewood Park.” At that time Mr. Phelps was the owner of the greater part of the land embraced in the subdivision. Llis deed to the appellant which referred to a plat of all the lots in Ridgewood Park, contained covenants that the lot conveyed should ho used for ITkíkm Qlllyi that, not more than one dwelling
should be built on the lot, and at a cost of not less than §3,500.00; that the front of the dwelling should conform to the line already…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Peabody Heights Co. v. WillsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Summers v. BeelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Halle v. NewboldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Mott v. . OppenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Newbold v. Peabody Heights Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Buffalo Academy of Sacred Heart v. Boehm Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Turner v. BrocatoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- McKenrick v. Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Hancock v. GummSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- McQuade v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.