Legal Opinion

Salem Capital Flour Mills Co. v. Stayton Water-Ditch & Canal Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided December 19, 1887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. On bill for injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This suit is brought by the Salem Capital Flour-Mills Company, a British corporation, against the Stayton Water-Ditch & Canal Company, a corporation formed under the laws of Oregon, and Silas A. and S. W. B. Jones, citizens of Oregon, to have said defendants enjoined from interfering with the prolongation of the plaintiff’s ditch, whereby waier is taken from the Santiam river and conducted in the channel of Mill creek to Salem, for the use of the plaintiff’s mills; and from diverting the water from the same.

The defendants demur to the bill, for that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashhurst v. GivenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  2. Donnell v. HumphreysMontana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Willamette Manufacturing Co. v. Bank of British ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Thompson v. UglowOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Dyer v. DepuiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. J. L. Cooper & Co. v. Anchor Securities Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Patterson v. Chambers Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Haugen v. SundsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Cullison v. Hotel Seaside, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API