Legal Opinion
United States v. Peninsula Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 22, 2002No. 01-35965PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.
• Peninsula Communications, Inc. (“Peninsula”), owner of several Alaska radio stations, appeals the district court’s orders denying its motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, denying its motions to stay, and issuing a preliminary injunction ordering it to cease operation of certain of its stations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
I
Factual and Procedural Background
The United States sued Peninsula below for an injunction requiring Peninsula to comply with an order by the Federal Communications Commission…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marlene Eberle, and Robert Kiser v. City of Anaheim Anaheim Police Department P. Shepard Hagenson MonsoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Riverside-Linden Investment Co., Debtor. Ralph O. Boldt, Trustee Estes & Hoyt v. Kathryn Crake Earl HaferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Roy Mason AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America v. Ned Warren, Sr., and Gale NaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Rucker v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Demery v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Rattlesnake Coalition v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.