Legal Opinion
Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2006No. 04-56682PublishedCited by 268 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
DefendanL-Appellant Wild Oats Market, Inc. (“Wild Oats”) appeals the district court’s order remanding this action to state court. Wild Oats removed this action to the District Court for the Central District of California alleging that, because the parties were completely diverse and the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000, diversity jurisdiction existed under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and therefore removal was proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). 1 Plaintiff-Appellee Emma C. Lively (“Lively”) did not object to the removal. However, after the case had been pending in the district…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kelton Arms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. v. Homestead Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United Investors Life Insurance Company v. Waddell & Reed Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by268 opinions
- Coto Settlement v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Gibbons v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Polo v. Innoventions International, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Tommy Morris v. Salvatore NuzzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- David Ehrman v. Cox Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.