Legal Opinion
Rucker v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2001No. Nos. 98-16322, 98-16542PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS; Dissent by Judge SNEED.
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
Many of our nation’s poor live in public housing projects that, by many accounts, are little more than illegal drug markets and war zones. Innocent tenants live barricaded behind doors, in fear for their safety and the safety of their children. What these tenants may not realize is that, under existing policies of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), they should add another fear to their list: becoming homeless if a household member or guest engages in criminal drug activity…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Demery v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Earth Island Institute v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sierra Forest Legacy v. ReyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.