Legal Opinion

Demery v. Arpaio

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2004No. 03-15698PublishedCited by 254 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAEZ, Circuit Judge.

The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits punishment of pretrial detainees. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979). Applying this principle, the district court preliminarily enjoined the use of world-wide web cameras (“webcams”) in the Maricopa County Madison Street Jail. We must decide whether the district court abused its discretion • in granting the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*1024I.

When Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Ar-paio announced the installation of webcams in the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by254 opinions

  1. Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Calvin Slade v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail, and Commonwealth of Virginia, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. Samantha Vazquez v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API