Murray Publishing Co. v. Malmquist
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
Appellant Murray Publishing Company, Inc. (Murray Publishing), seeks review of a partial judgment dismissing its claim that respondents Gary Malmquist, Mark O'Keefe, and The Best Buy News (referred to collectively as Malmquist) tortiously interfered with a contract or business expectancy. Following a 2-day bench trial, the trial court determined that Malmquist had knowingly interfered with Murray Pubhshing's exclusive distribution contract with Advo Systems, Inc. (Advo), a direct mailing service.1 Malmquist has not challenged this determination. The trial court further found, however, that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Group14 Technologies Inc v. Nexeon LimitedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Jacob Manu v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Jacob Manu v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.