Legal Opinion
Wright & Hogan, Inc. v. Heide
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 1925No. Docket No. 5018PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Motion to dismiss appeal on the ground that no notice of appeal has been filed. In support of said motion the respondent has cited the following decisions of the supreme and appellate courts of this state: Boling v. Alton, 162 Cal. 297 [122 Pac. 461]; Marcucci v. Vowinckel, 164 Cal. 693 [130 Pac. 430]; Michelson v. City of Sacramento, 173 Cal. 108 [159 Pac. 431]; Eddy v. Hunter, 46 Cal. App. 370 [189 Pac. 291], These cases, it will be observed, were all decided under section 941b of the Code of Civil Procedure, prior to its repeal in 1921. This section required that a notice of appeal given…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marcucci v. VowinckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Anderson v. Standard Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Boling v. AltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Michelson v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Reas v. ClemenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Purity Springs Water Co. v. Redwood Ice DeliveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Forthmann v. MyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Aregood v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Mamer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.