Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Standard Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1923No. Civ. No. 2534PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that no actual notice of appeal was ever given. The language adopted by appellant to effect his purpose is as follows: “You and each of you will please take notice that the plaintiff in the above-entitled action desires and intends to appeal to the District Court of Appeal of the State of California, Third Appellate District, from the judgment made and entered in said action,” etc. It is the contention of respondent that the foregoing is not equivalent to a notice that the plaintiff “does appeal,” but that it simply expresses a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Boling v. AltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. In Re Estate of FaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. In Re Estate of NuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Wall v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pesce v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Purity Springs Water Co. v. Redwood Ice DeliveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Estate of RobersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Forthmann v. MyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API