Michelson v. City of Sacramento
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The charter of Sacramento provides that no ordinance shall take effect until thirty days after its passage except a tax ordinance, and “except an ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety, which contains a statement of its urgency and is passed by a four-fifths vote of the City Commission.” (Stats. (Spec. Sess.) 1911, sec. 270, p. 400.) On June 30, 1915, the commission passed an ordinance, section 30 of which declared that it was for the immediate preservation of the public safety, and a matter of urgency, and should take effect fifteen days after its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Marcucci v. VowinckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Boling v. AltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- In Re Estate of FaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bailey v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Sanborn v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Morgan v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Hatfield v. MeersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.