Legal Opinion
State v. Raflik
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 2001No. 00-1086-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJon P. Wilcox, J.
¶ 1. This case requires us to decide whether suppression is the proper remedy when a telephonic application for a search warrant is not recorded in accordance with Wis. Stat. § 968.12(3)(d)1, and when the factual basis for the warrant is reconstructed in an ex parte hearing after the warrant has been executed. We conclude that suppression is improper, and that the warrant application in this case was appropriately and adequately reconstructed.
¶ 2. The State charged Cherise Raflik with seven felony drug counts, including possession of tetrahydro-cannabinol (THC) with intent to deliver, drug…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. KrajewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. NobleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. StraehlerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- People v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.