State v. McNeely
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Per curiam
Tyler McNeely (Defendant) refused to consent to an alcohol breath test or a blood test after he was arrested for driving while intoxicated. The arresting patrolman, without seeking a warrant from a judge, ordered a medical professional to draw Defendant’s blood. The trial court sustained Defendant’s motion to suppress the results of the blood test as the noneonsen-sual and warrantless blood draw was a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.
The issue before the Court in this interlocutory appeal is: Under what “special facts” is a nonconsensual and warrantless blood draw in a DWI case a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. BohlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- Jesse Thomas Sutherland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
- People v. EubanksIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
- State of Missouri v. Charles A. Selvy, Jr.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.