Legal Opinion

State v. McNeely

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 17, 2012No. SC 91850PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

Tyler McNeely (Defendant) refused to consent to an alcohol breath test or a blood test after he was arrested for driving while intoxicated. The arresting patrolman, without seeking a warrant from a judge, ordered a medical professional to draw Defendant’s blood. The trial court sustained Defendant’s motion to suppress the results of the blood test as the noneonsen-sual and warrantless blood draw was a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.

The issue before the Court in this interlocutory appeal is: Under what “special facts” is a nonconsensual and warrantless blood draw in a DWI case a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. State v. BohlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. Jesse Thomas Sutherland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  4. People v. EubanksIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State of Missouri v. Charles A. Selvy, Jr.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API