Legal Opinion

State v. Bohling

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1993No. 91-0811-CRPublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issue in this case is whether the fact that the percentage of alcohol in a person's blood stream rapidly diminishes after drinking stops alone constitutes a sufficient exigency under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I Section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution, to justify a warrantless blood draw under the following circumstances: (1) the blood draw is taken at the direction of a law enforcement officer from a person lawfully arrested for a drunk-driving related violation or crime, and (2) there is a cléar indication that the blood draw will produce…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. FryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. Michael R. TullbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API