State v. Bohling
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.
The issue in this case is whether the fact that the percentage of alcohol in a person's blood stream rapidly diminishes after drinking stops alone constitutes a sufficient exigency under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I Section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution, to justify a warrantless blood draw under the following circumstances: (1) the blood draw is taken at the direction of a law enforcement officer from a person lawfully arrested for a drunk-driving related violation or crime, and (2) there is a cléar indication that the blood draw will produce…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. FryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Michael R. TullbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.