Legal Opinion

De Laittre v. Chase

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1910No. Nos. 16,799—(185)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in the district court for Aitkin county to determine adverse claims to certain real estate. The. summons and notice of lis pendens were served by publication and there was no appearance by any defendant. The case was tried before McClenahan, J"., who on May 21, 1909, made findings of fact and as conclusions of law ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Aitkin county to determine adverse claims to certain real estate. The. summons and notice of lis pendens were served by publication and there was no appearance by any defendant. The case was tried before McClenahan, J"., who on May 21, 1909, made findings of fact and as conclusions of law ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. On May 4, 1910, the court granted an order that plaintiff show cause why the judgment should not be vacated and defendants Robert Anderson and Alfred Teisberg should not be permitted to serve their answer. From an order discharging the…

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action brought in the district court of the county of Aitkin to determine adverse claims to the land described in the complaint. Service of the summons was by publication. The defendants did not ap.pear, and a default judgment, on May 21, 1909, was entered, granting the plaintiff the relief asked for in his complaint. On May 4, 1910, the court made its order requiring the plaintiff to show cause on May 11 next thereafter why the judgment should not be vacated, and the appellants, Robert- Anderson and Alfred Teisberg, be permitted to serve their answers herein. The order was based on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lord v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Bogart v. KieneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Frankoviz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Fifield v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Cutler v. ButtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doherty v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Wheaton Flour Mills Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Bellman v. BeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Pedersen v. NewtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Kane v. StallmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API