Doherty v. Ryan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant Cannon moved tbe district court for Ramsey county ■to open the judgment in the above entitled action, and for leave to file and serve his answer to the complaint therein, and obtained an •order requiring plaintiff and the defendants other than himself to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and he be allowed to defend. The motion was heard before Kelly, J., who granted it upon terms. Erom the order, defendant Cannon appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Action in partition. The complaint sets out that plaintiff is the owner of an undivided one-half of a lot in the city of St. Pañi; that the lot is worth $3,000; that various defendants named have undivided interests therein, among whom is 'the defendant Michael Cannon, claiming, as sole heir of Honora Cannon, his deceased wife, an undivided one twenty-eighth interest which she derived from her father Thomas Fitzgerald, who died seized of an undivided one-fourth of the lot; also that said Michael Cannon claims to be the owner of an undivided three-fourths of the lot acquired by said Honora…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lord v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Bausman v. TilleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Frankoviz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Smalley v. IsaacsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Fifield v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Wilcox v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Schoonmaker v. St. Paul Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Pedersen v. NewtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Kane v. StallmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- People ex rel. Lemon v. ElmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.