Legal Opinion

Wheaton Flour Mills Co. v. Welch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 11, 1913No. Nos. 18,133—(235)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Traverse county denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment and grant him leave to defend the action on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his application • to open a default and permit him to defend.

The action is to cancel a mortgage of $3,500 held by defendant upon plaintiff’s land in Traverse county, this state. On August 3, 1912, defendant was a resident of the city of New York. On that day, the complaint and the affidavit prescribed for service of the *397summons by publication were filed. Tbe latter shows that at the same time a copy of the summons was mailed to defendant. No other papers in the action appear to have been filed until September 20, 1912. Defendant expected the suit,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lord v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Bogart v. KieneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. H. L. Spencer Co. v. KoellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Frankoviz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. Cutler v. ButtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BielejeskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Nahas v. NahasNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Bellman v. BeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Pedersen v. NewtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Kane v. StallmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API