Legal Opinion

Slaback v. Wakefield

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1959No. Civ. No. 5978Published

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Plaintiffs-appellants, husband and wife, brought this action against defendant-respondent for claimed damages as a result of certain improvements to a roadway (designated as Lots A and B) in a tract of land laid out and dedicated by the owner-subdivider for the use and benefit of adjoining lot owners in the tract located in the foothills of eastern Orange County and used primarily for mountain homes. The general terrain was rough, wooded and brushy. Silverado Creek flowed through this tract and lands owned by plaintiffs which are designated as Parcels 1, 2, and 3, on a map marked plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API