Legal Opinion
Lincoln City Chamber of Commerce v. City of Lincoln City
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 8, 1999No. LUBA 98-153; CA A107266PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s decision affirming the City of Lincoln City’s enactment of amendments to its zoning ordinance (LCZO) that petitioners contend are facially unconstitutional. We affirm.
The challenged amendments to LCZO 4.300 and LCZO 4.310 were adopted in 1998. As amended, LCZO 4.300 provides, in material part:
“(1) No building permit shall be issued for the addition, alteration, or repair, within any twelve month period exceeding fifty (50) percent of the assessed value or market value, whichever is greater, of an existing building or structure, or for a new building or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Schultz v. City of Grants PassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- J.C. Reeves Corp. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Art Piculell Group v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Glossip v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Childress v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000