Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Roefaro

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1997PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This case asks us to decide whether an evidentiary ruling, admitting evidence of prior stalking convictions to prove a later stalking charge, violates a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy. It does not, and we will uphold the trial court because the introduction of the evidence was proper and the illogical extension of appellant’s argument makes a mockery of the great constitutional protection against double jeopardy envisioned by our forefathers.

During the spring of 1989, while working at a local mall, Barbara Blair made the acquaintance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. UrrutiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. PeerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. HollomanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. D'CollanfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Streater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond LindellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. LeachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Daker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API