Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Holloman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 22, 1993No. 645PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge.
William Holloman, Jr. was tried by jury and was found guilty of robbery, aggravated assault, theft by receiving stolen property, possession of an instrument of crime and criminal conspiracy. 1 Post-trial and supplemental post-trial motions were denied, and Holloman was sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment for not less than five (5) years nor more than ten (10) years. 2 On direct appeal from the judgment of sentence, Holloman argues that a combination of trial court errors and improper conduct by the prosecuting attorney 'entitles him to a new trial.
On July 3, 1989, at or…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. PeerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Decker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Commonwealth v. GuySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.