Commonwealth v. Urrutia
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
The issue we decide, inter alia, is whether evidence of related prior bad acts is admissible where appellant has been charged with stalking. 18 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 2709(b). We find the evidence of related prior bad acts admissible, and we affirm the judgment of sentence.
Appellant Donald Urrutia was found guilty of terroristic threats and stalking. He was involved in a long term relationship with the victim, Denise Thompson. After having two children, the parties ended their relationship. Following the break-up the trial court granted Thompson’s petition for a Protection From Abuse…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BillaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. LoschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. Cruz-CentenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. MartsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.