Legal Opinion

State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond Lindell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 8, 2013No. 11–0770PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZAGER, Justice.

This appeal centers on the question of whether a previous conviction for stalking under Iowa Code section 708.11 can be used to establish a course of conduct for a subsequent stalking violation. We find the legislature intended that for purposes of determining whether an offense is a second or subsequent offense of stalking, pri- or violations of the stalking statute can be considered as evidence of the course of conduct necessary for a prosecution for stalking as a second or subsequent offense. We further find that the rale of lenity does not apply, as Lindell had sufficient…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Valentin VelezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Larry D. Schaefer and Elaine M. Schaefer v. Dale L. Putnam, Putnam Law Office, and SMP, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. State of Iowa v. Betty Ann NallSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. State of Vermont v. Christian J. NollSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  5. Daniel B. Walker v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API