State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond Lindell
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ZAGER, Justice.
This appeal centers on the question of whether a previous conviction for stalking under Iowa Code section 708.11 can be used to establish a course of conduct for a subsequent stalking violation. We find the legislature intended that for purposes of determining whether an offense is a second or subsequent offense of stalking, pri- or violations of the stalking statute can be considered as evidence of the course of conduct necessary for a prosecution for stalking as a second or subsequent offense. We further find that the rale of lenity does not apply, as Lindell had sufficient…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Valentin VelezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Larry D. Schaefer and Elaine M. Schaefer v. Dale L. Putnam, Putnam Law Office, and SMP, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State of Iowa v. Betty Ann NallSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State of Vermont v. Christian J. NollSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Daniel B. Walker v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.