Legal Opinion
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided April 20, 2011No. Civil Action 2:10cv441PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., and Medtronic Vascular, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” or “Medtronic”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 After examining the motion, associated briefs, and the Complaint, the Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and oral argument would not aid in the decisional process. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); E.D. Va. Loc. R. 7(J). Therefore,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. Consumeraffairs. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charles v. Front Royal Volunteer Fire & Rescue Department, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014
- Faryniarz v. RamirezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Macronix International Co. v. Spansion Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Gradient Enterprises, Inc. v. Skype Technologies S.A.District Court, W.D. New York · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.