Legal Opinion

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 3, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2:10cv441PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. and Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (collectively “Gore”) filed this action against Defendants, Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., and Medtronic Vascular, Inc. (collectively “Medtronic”), alleging that Medtronic infringed upon Gore’s U.S. Patent No. 5,810,870 (“the '870 patent”), entitled “Intraluminal Stent Graft.” Medtronic, in turn, has asserted various affirmative defenses and counterclaims. Gore’s Motion to Dismiss Medtronic’s Inequitable Conduct Counterclaim, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. Consumeraffairs. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  4. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Front Row Technologies, LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  2. Certusview Technologies, LLC v. S & N Locating Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  3. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  4. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. v. BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  5. HOOKER FURNISHINGS CORPORATION v. THE ELEANOR RIGBY LEATHER CO.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API