Legal Opinion
Faryniarz v. Ramirez
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 1, 2014No. 3:13-CV-01064 (CSH)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT ATTACHMENT
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.
This case was dismissed on August 5, 2013, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Docs. [13] and [16]. Plaintiff Joseph Faryniarz has since filed a motion to amend the complaint (Doc. # 18) and proposed amended .complaint, which asserts civil Racketeer Influenced and Cprrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962, and patent infringement violations, 35 U.S.C. § 271, as the bases for this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction. He has also filed a motion for…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Courtois v. Central Connecticut State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Curtis v. GreenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Diaz v. State of Connecticut Department of Developmental ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Fairfield Sentry Limited ( In Liquidation) v. Fortis Global Custody Services N.V. n/k/a ABN AMROUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Fairfield Sentry Limited ( In Liquidation) v. Merrill Lynch Bank (Suisse) SAUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.