Legal Opinion

Holmes v. City of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1985No. 84-266PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock adopted an ordinance which proposed the annexation of fifteen separate tracts of land, designated “A” through “O.” An election was held, and the vote was in favor of the annexation, both in the City and in the previously unincorporated area. Appellant, who owns land in tract H, and others challenged the annexation in circuit court. All of the challenges, excepting appellant’s, were dismissed. Appellant contends that tracts A, B, C, G, K, and O were annexed in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-307.1 (Repl. 1980). The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. City of Crossett v. AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Brown v. Peach OrchardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. City of Little Rock v. FindleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Parrish v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gay v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Lee v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Gay v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Chappell v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Utley v. City of DoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API