Gay v. City of Springdale
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The City Council of Springdale adopted an ordinance which proposed the annexation of five separate tracts of land totaling 7,000 acres. The land was predominantly used for agricultural purposes. An election was held, and the vote was in favor of the annexation. The remonstrants challenged the annexation in circuit court. The trial court upheld the annexation. We reverse.
The first paragraph of our annexation statute provides that a city may annex lands when one of five criteria is met.
Any municipality may . . . adopt an ordinance to annex lands contiguous to said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wasp Oil, Inc. v. Arkansas Oil & Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- City of Crossett v. AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Saunders v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Faucett v. City of AtkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gay v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Lee v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Chastain v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Chappell v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Utley v. City of DoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.