Legal Opinion

Parrish v. City of Russellville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 12, 1973No. 5-6164PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

For reversal of an order annexing 6,398 acres to the City of Russellville, appellants Jim Parrish, et al, chicken farmers, hog farmers and fish farmers, contend among other things that the published description required by Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-101 (Repl. 1968), is insufficient and that their lands are not adaptable nor presently needed for town purposes.

The record shows a description in two parts. The first part commences at the SE-Corner of Sec. 9, T 7 N, R 20 W and then describes a line that terminates at the point in SWH NWM Sec. 31, T 8 N, R 20 W where the Missouri…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Fletcher v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1868
  3. Martin v. DixMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  4. State Ex Rel. American Manufacturing Co. of Texas v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Cary v. City of PekinIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Lee v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Saunders v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. City of North Little Rock v. GarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Chastain v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API