Utley v. City of Dover
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
WH. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.
This appeal sticinterpretation e. statute allowing for annexation of lands contiguous to municipalities and the exceptions thereto. The appellant, Dan Utley, challenged an annexation approved by a majority of voters in a special election held by the City of Dover, on April 10, 2001; appellant complained that the annexation violated Arkansas law set forth in Ark. Code Ann. §§ 14-40-301 to 304 (Repl. 1998 and Supp. 2001). The trial court upheld the annexation. We affirm.
On February 6, 2001, appellee, the City of Dover (hereafter “Dover”), adopted its Ordinance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Bunch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Cadillac Cowboy, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Jones v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Weigel v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Pine Bluff for Safe Disposal v. Arkansas Pollution Control & Ecology CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Ouachita Rr v. Circuit Ct of Union CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.